[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IMPORTANT: Additional information about UDCM.

To: "Mark M." <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: IMPORTANT: Additional information about UDCM.
From: Toto <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 01:17:04 -0800
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Organization: TOTO Enterprises
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

Mark M. wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jan 1997 [email protected] wrote:
> 
> > IN RESPONSE TO THE FLAME MAIL DATA RESEARCH HAS BEEN RECEIVING:

  The 'flames' used as examples seemed to me to be nothing more than
valid questions regarding the DataETR's claims for their software.

(Big Hint / Questions from conferences with the word 'punks' in the
name are not likely to be accompanied by bowing gestures and
exclaimations of amazement at unsubstantiated claims).

> >  0.390625% is the best possible percentage. Are all of you out there
> > satisfied?
> 
> Not especially.  I'd still be interested in the design criteria used to develop
> this algorithm.  Until you publish the full source and technical data, I will
> have to assume that the algorithm is insecure.

  Keep in mind that many CypherPunks dream in numbers.

Toto

References:
- Re: IMPORTANT: Additional information about UDCM.
  - From: "Mark M." <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Humor from the UDCM help file
Next by Date: Search for Remailer
Prev by thread: Re: IMPORTANT: Additional information about UDCM.
Next by thread: Re: IMPORTANT: Additional information about UDCM.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread