[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dedikend Cut's and such

To: [email protected] (Jim Choate)
Subject: Re: Dedikend Cut's and such
From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 22:50:10 -0800 (PST)
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <199701200008.SAA00943@einstein> from "Jim Choate" at Jan 19, 97 06:08:23 pm
Sender: [email protected]

Jim Choate allegedly said:
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Did a little research, Dedekind Cut's and such use Integers to define a
> SPECIFIC Real to a arbitrary BUT FIXED resolution. They do not define the
> set of Reals.

They do.  The set of all numbers representable by a DC is precisely 
the set of reals.

-- 
Kent Crispin				"No reason to get excited",
[email protected],[email protected]		the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint:   5A 16 DA 04 31 33 40 1E  87 DA 29 02 97 A3 46 2F

References:
- Dedikend Cut's and such
  - From: Jim Choate <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: 'Monster' numbers
Next by Date: Re: infinity & set membership
Prev by thread: Dedikend Cut's and such
Next by thread: Re: Dedikend Cut's and such
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread