Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks maiing list

[dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)]

"William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@amaranth.com> writes:
> >  It is obvious that some of the more intuitively intelligent list
> >members are aware of this, as is indicated by the nervous fear with
> >which they 'explain why' their post is crypto-relevant.
>
> IMHO this is sheepish though I have noticed it before moderation started.
>
> If I have somthing to post to the list I see no reason to justify why I am
> posting it. This post I am making now has zero crypto-relevance and I make
> no appoligies for it. Do I think it is relevant to the list? Yes otherwise
> I would not have posted it. Either way no explination for the post is needed.

Sandy is irrelevant.  Why should we care if he tosses an article
to cyphepunks-flames or to the censored list?  Just subscribe to
cypherpunks-unedited and ignore Sandy.  If Gilmore persists in his
disgraceful behavior, create an unmoderated list elsewhere.

I think a lot of intelligent people have been wasting too much time
and energy analyzing the behavior of a twit who simply doesn't
deserve the attention his moderation effort has been getting.

---

<a href="mailto:dlv@bwalk.dm.com">Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM</a>
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps