[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Analysis of proposed UK ban on use of non-escrowed crypto.

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Analysis of proposed UK ban on use of non-escrowed crypto.
From: [email protected] (Huge Cajones Remailer)
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 16:22:01 -0800
Comments: Please report misuse of this automated remailing service to <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

Kent Crispin dribbled syphlyrically:
 
> Like it or not, businesses like -- no, *need* -- key escrow -- company
> secrets can't go down the drain because someone gets hit by a truck.

  An exact quote from some of your earlier posts.
  Are you working from a cheat-sheet?
  Is someone _telling_ you what to say?
  Are they holding your kids hostage and _making_ you say this?
  Is it time for Big Brother to hire some fresh writers?

TruthMonger

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Analysis of proposed UK ban on use of non-escrowed crypto.
  - From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Sabotaging Big Brother Inside Corporate Complicity
Next by Date: Re: Book-entry settlement mechanism
Prev by thread: Re: Analysis of proposed UK ban on use of non-escrowed crypto.
Next by thread: Re: Analysis of proposed UK ban on use of non-escrowed crypto.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread