[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Feds reading this list, Jim Bell, and threats
On Fri, Apr 04, 1997 at 01:41:38PM -0500, John Young wrote:
> On Phil Hallam-Baker's rejoinder to Paul Bradley' defense of AP:
[...]
> Rushdie, hmm. Phil what mind-swill you elbow-tipping? Is Rushie not
> closer to Jim Bell than he is to you in challenging the arrogant mullahs
> of highly sophisticated armed thuggery. Who you shillinging for these
> days, Crispin's bandits of the NLs?
Crispin shills for himself, not the NLs or any bandits or anyone else.
Phil Hallam-Baker shills for Phil Hallam-Baker. Jim Bell's advocacy
of armed thuggery speaks for itself.
--
Kent Crispin "No reason to get excited",
[email protected] the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55
http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html