[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(Fwd) Re: AP Revisited
------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 1997 11:48:48 -0400
From: Hallam-Baker <[email protected]>
To: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: AP Revisited
I think its quite wrong to see Clinton as someone who believes in
the authoritarian position, the real problem is he cuts his cloth
according to the popular whim.
Think again. Clinton and his administration are rabid when it comes
to cryopto policy and the expansion of the FBI and others ability to
pry into the lives of innocent citizens.. The draft of the crypto
legislation is a good example of how, when given an opportunity to
act out of the general public's sight and grasp, he's in there
seeking even more ridiculously easy ways to get into everybodies
business. I mean the current draft requires only a govt request in
order to obtain access to your email. NOT a court ordered/appproved
warrant- They may as well ask to be allowed to open and read
every letter and pkg at the post office too.(and if this draft
becomes law they probably will)
All of these 'new' and neccessary' intrusions are Clinton
proposals, not hold overs from some other admininstration. If he were
opposed in principle he could certainly 'cut his cloth' along less
authoratarian lines, following the lead of many of the
administrations own committee reports that have come out against key
escrow plans, but he will not budge on the issue. In fact, each time
it is put back out there it gets worse.
Clinton's ability to coopt left energy and appear to be less than he
is is- earning appologistic comments like the one above- is what is
really frightening. When it comes to US citizens civil liberties,
Clinton is more dangerous than Reagan and Bush put together and I
wouldn't call either of them friends of the people.
Since it has been thrown around so much, remember that Hitler was a
most powerful speaker, who connected well with the masses,
couching nazi policy in the terms that gave the people what they
wanted to hear. They too thought he was a most sincere and earnest
fellow, with only the good of the country at heart.
A 'Nixon' would never get away with this sort of proposal- but a
telegenic, non-enhaling, sax playing, mcdonalds eating, aw shucks,
(they lay it on thick you think?) well meaning bubba?
--C
**********************************************************************
Charles Anthony
[email protected]
http://www.info-nation.com
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.6.3a
mQBtAzM63W8AAAEDAMRi15+AIXC0j2R7IrdeNhM7AQXPGAYAd2mCNhKrQa09fICZ
4jEpTd0biV+3nMAL6/6pWUm1AmFPS/FngecmXkrmMPlbgv3O0dapbJ2/FQf3XUtH
Z5AEOdKL9xK5Ml7dCQAFE7QIY2FudGhvbnmJAHUDBRAzOt1wi/cSuTJe3QkBAemw
AwC1DGxodXVPkA1D6uLdqFvP5H3/98i/gM2x9IvvfZscWszwrJuOhkYyd71TF7K5
gy55OqPp+Rf77On0XhmHoi98Y4HOSTHYPhN9o9zQQ+pn/4HmxQ4Tbtih2sCDNvmG
b2g=
=0pHR
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----