[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SSL weakness affecting links from pa

To: Black Unicorn <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: SSL weakness affecting links from pa
From: Bryce <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 20:34:08 +0200
cc: Tom Weinstein <[email protected]>, [email protected], Bill Stewart <[email protected]>, ARTURO GRAPA YSUNZA <[email protected]>, "Mark M." <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 14 Apr 1997 12:14:47 EDT." <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]


 A million monkeys operating under the pseudonym 
 "Black Unicorn <[email protected]>" typed:
>
> "You are about to forward a referer header to the page you have selected.
> Forwarding the referer header to this site may reveal more about your web
> browsing habits than you would prefer.  Should <netscape> surpress the
> referer header?  Yes/No/Always Surpress/Never Surpress."


Minor UI nit:  it would be much much better if it said 


"You are about to send a 'referrer header' telling the next web 
site about the web page you are currently looking at.  Should 
<netscape> send this 'referrer header'?  
[Yes/No/Always Send Referrer Headers/Never Send Referrer Headers]"



Regards,

Zooko Journeyman

Disclaimers follow:  I am not a cypherpunk.  NOT speaking for 
DigiCash or any other person or organization.  No PGP sig follows.

References:
- Re: SSL weakness affecting links from pa
  - From: Black Unicorn <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: SSL weakness affecting links from pa
Next by Date: Re: A Rumor and Reputation Paradox...
Prev by thread: Re: SSL weakness affecting links from pa
Next by thread: Re: SSL weakness affecting links from pa
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread