[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PATHS: Internet Taxation (Wednesday May 7, 4:15 pm) (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In <[email protected]>, on
04/28/97 at 01:52 AM,
Rich Graves <[email protected]> said:
>Should electronic commerce be taxed, and how?
No, NEVER!!!
>What should be taxed, income, sales, or both?
None of the Above
>Who should tax, the federal government, states, or both?
Neither
>Should a special excise tax be imposed on selected aspects of electronic
>commerce?
No ofcource not.
>Is Internet taxation feasible, and how?
No it is not.
>Answering these and similar questions requires agreement on the
>appropriate economic objectives of Internet taxation combined with an
>understanding of the dynamic interplay between technological and legal
>forces.
<sigh> It is obvious that whomever wrote this that they have already made
up their mind that the Internet should be taxed and are only interested in
disscussing on how to divide up the loot.
The above questions are a good example of push polling though.
- --
- -----------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0
Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
Finger [email protected] for PGP Key and other info
- -----------------------------------------------------------
Tag-O-Matic: Have you crashed your Windows today?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Registered User E-Secure v1.1 ES000000
iQCVAwUBM2Rugo9Co1n+aLhhAQFpAAP/VdOIo/vRWtg+MHfUEmzjFg4ri29GWAI4
x7NJ8JpD7shsIDCdLsNw/0sM1iadSekvOo8CFRwAp+1PbN2C9BtB6U1WCcT8C8AA
O36DrZQJlCOD2oMvhmyU1LztT/JHR0Tw0/+aJp8AL6MLLfkq1fJ3I/jja6HCv+JS
YJqAZOsymJM=
=ZaQZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----