Re: SAFE Bill is a Good Thing--"Crypto For The Masses"

[Seth Finkelstein <sethf@MIT.EDU>]

>>On Thu, 1 May 1997, Alan Davidson wrote:
>> 2. CDT Does Not Support The Criminal Provision in SAFE

>At 22:09 5/01/97 -0500, Mac Norton wrote:
>I don't get it.  CDT loudly supports the bill. The bill
>contains the criminal provision.  I don't get it.  Do you?

	I keep having bad flashbacks to Digital Telephony, and
pre-CDA. Virtually all the lobbying groups would run around saying
things like "we support this bill, but oppose this provision". Or
convoluted stuff like "We oppose all these bills, but of the measures
being considered, we support this one".
	The pattern is really bothering me.

================
Seth Finkelstein
sethf@mit.edu