[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IBM's New Algo
John Young <[email protected]> writes:
> The New York Times, May 7, 1997, p. D5.
>
> I.B.M. Researchers Develop A New Encryption Formula
...
> The system is based on a problem that has defied solution
> by mathematicians for 150 years, I.B.M. said.
I had an interesting conversation a few weeks ago with a friend who has
a closed-form solution to a well-known problem that's been unsolved for
about that long. He has no intention of publishing it, but he has already
made quite a bit of $$$ on it. :-)
I've known the guy for a number of years and it's not the first time he gets
a good result and makes money on it instead of yet another paper in a
refereed journal. In general, lots more is known to some people than is
published. E.g. it's possible that some of stuff I did for my Ph.D. thesis
was done by the British crypto people but never made it to the open literatre.
> Mr. Schneier said that the cryptographic formulas now in
> use were already robust enough. The biggest challenge, he
> said, is creating security systems in the real world that
> are not vulnerable to hackers.
>
> "Cryptography is a lot more than math" he said.
Let me get this straight - Schneier claims that factoring is secure now and
will remain secure in the future?
---
<a href="mailto:[email protected]">Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM</a>
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps