[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IRS Hit

To: Jim Burnes <[email protected]>, "William H. Geiger III" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: IRS Hit
From: Greg Broiles <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 1997 17:05:23 -0700
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]


At 04:59 PM 6/5/97 -0600, Jim Burnes wrote:
>The defendant is perfectly able to bring charges in this matter against
>James Dolan personally.  There is precedent in this.  If my read of
>the judge is accurate he is saying, "go after him because he was acting
>outside his office".
>
>I can't remember the exact name of this decision, but I think it was
>something like "so-and-so vs. 5 unnamed FBI officers".

It's _Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents_, 403 US 388 (1971),
or <http://www.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=403&invol=388>.


--
Greg Broiles                | US crypto export control policy in a nutshell:
[email protected]         | 
http://www.io.com/~gbroiles | Export jobs, not crypto.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IRS Hit
  - From: "William H. Geiger III" <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: IRS Hit
  - From: "William H. Geiger III" <[email protected]>
- Re: IRS Hit
  - From: Jim Burnes <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: 0,4,11276,00.html?dtn.head
Next by Date: Re: Who "invented" remailers?
Prev by thread: Re: IRS Hit
Next by thread: Re: IRS Hit
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread