[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Responses to "Spam costs and questions" (long)
I don't think commercial speech should be treated as second-class speech.
But my position is hardly surprising.
-Declan
On Sun, 8 Jun 1997, William H. Geiger III wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> In <[email protected]>, on 06/07/97
> at 12:54 PM, [email protected] (Igor Chudov @ home) said:
>
> >There is a lot of commercial compelled speech. For example,
> >mutual funds must say that past performance is not a guarantee of future
> >results.
>
> >Do you find this kind of compelled speech unconstitutional?
>
> Well I don't know how Duncan feels about it but I think it's highly
> unconstutional.
>
> - --
> - ---------------------------------------------------------------
> William H. Geiger III http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii
> Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0
>
> Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
> PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
> OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html
> - ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.3a
> Charset: cp850
> Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000
>
> iQCVAwUBM5qcNo9Co1n+aLhhAQFKXgQAiGRKXCDfuQ8/UBQtkucbG/MygYd3Gq51
> EkGt6Kmp+mbz2wGhFcEYXrK34TYCmTmE6ThiB96UoB4Qsz7I2kmm4TCbR3/cP8/9
> fl+eLHGfXaKu59g4s+7thCVCZXgHVbyrPLakYwIqj1n+Wtqp8ARHcgoAJXZP+I+N
> 59n7r3qg/aU=
> =2yF5
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>