[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Recipient Anonymity

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Recipient Anonymity
From: [email protected] (Ulf M�ller)
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 97 22:37 GMT+0200
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Organization: Hoher Rath der Dreizehn Weisen vom Feed
Sender: [email protected]


>Except for the additional server-to-server communications necessary to
>broadcast new messages into the system, the bandwidth utilization is
>comparable to sender-anonymous remailers; it scales linearly as the
>number of parties involved in the delivery of a particular message.

How are messages selected?  It seems that the recipient needs to know
the message IDs of all messages in the system, and must have a way to
identify his messages.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Recipient Anonymity
  - From: [email protected] (Matthew Ghio)

References:
- Recipient Anonymity
  - From: [email protected] (Matthew Ghio)

Prev by Date: It ain't just crypto they're screwing with....
Next by Date: ping
Prev by thread: Recipient Anonymity
Next by thread: Re: Recipient Anonymity
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread