[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Nuclear Hedge Funds
"William H. Geiger III" <[email protected]> writes:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> In <[email protected]>, on 09/09/97
> at 01:00 PM, Unicorn <[email protected]> said:
> >Destruction by a nuclear blast is most likely not even the issue here.
> >Using a relatively small amount of plutonium (ie. not even enough to
> >produce a critical mass) and enough explosives to blast this into the
> >atmosphere you can kill a (very) large number of people over a
> >relatively small amount of time due to plutonium toxication. These
> >devices are the real "dirty gadgets", not really expensive and therefor
> >perfectly suitable for terrorist organisations.
> >But what a dreadfull way to die...
> The US military during WWII had plans of doing just that in Europe to
> poison the crops and aid in the defeat of Germany.
> Luck for Europe this was never followed through.
Actually, the Germans were aware of the plans and indicated that
they'd kill the about 500K U.S. and British POWs if this happened.
(They treated the latter much better than they treated Polish
and Russian POWs, who were often summarily gassed.)
For the same reason the Germans and the Allies didn't use poison
gas in Europe during WW2, although both sides used it liberally
in WW1, and the Japanese used it a lot against the Chinese.
Game theory and stuff. :-)
<a href="mailto:[email protected]">Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM</a>
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps