[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: More on House Intelligence committee amendment on crypto

To: Declan McCullagh <[email protected]>, "William H. Geiger III" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: More on House Intelligence committee amendment on crypto
From: Will Rodger <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 07:23:06 -0400
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


>> I understand that 1 congresscritter voted against the amendment, 
do you
>> know which one it was? I would like to make sure it wasn't Joe
>> Scarborough.

"Twas none other than Adam Smith - Rep. from Microsoft's own Puget 
sound. I saw his hand.

Will Rodger
Washington Bureau Chief
Inter@ctive Week

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv

iQA/AwUBNBkmGtZgKT/Hvj9iEQL3ggCgwAzUMsqPgbt/0X4ux0LW1onPNIEAnjcR
vSCY8TUImbNIt1eEyf1RrXWQ
=Z8em
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: More on House Intelligence committee amendment on crypto
  - From: Robert Hettinga <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: More on House Intelligence committee amendment on crypto
  - From: "William H. Geiger III" <[email protected]>
- Re: More on House Intelligence committee amendment on crypto
  - From: Declan McCullagh <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: RE: RE: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no bill
Next by Date: Re: in defense on Lon Horiuchi
Prev by thread: Re: More on House Intelligence committee amendment on crypto
Next by thread: Re: More on House Intelligence committee amendment on crypto
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread