[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Court proceedings under new SAFE act]



At 7:58 am -0400 on 9/14/97, Peter D. Junger wrote:


> : What if I respond to Adam Back and accidently forget to snip his .sig?
> : (if that's not prior restraint, I don't know what is!)
>
> What it is, under current law, is a violation of Export Administration
> Regulations, unless you somehow get a license before you send the
> reply.

Cool. At this rate, e$pam has violated the law several thousand times,
given the number of Adam's posts I've forwarded to it over the years, and
the number of foriegn e$pam subscribers.

Heck. Jail would be a great place to write an uninterrupted book-length
screed. I'm too ugly to be anyone's 'wife', anyway...



Cheers,
Bob Hettinga

-----------------
Robert Hettinga ([email protected]), Philodox
e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/