[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sooner or later
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: sooner or later
- From: Anonymous <[email protected]>
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 12:47:33 -0400
- Comments: This message was remailed by a FREE automatedremailing service. For additional information on this service,send a message with the subject "remailer-help" [email protected] The body of the message will bediscarded. To report abuse, contact the operator [email protected] Headers below this point wereinserted by the original sender.
- Sender: [email protected]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Bill Stewart wrote:
>At 10:45 PM 9/18/97 -0700, Wei Dai wrote:
>>Many of us believe that a crypto ban is inevitable. The only
>>question for us is whether it'll happen sooner or later. Seen in
>>this perspective, all that industry and civil liberties lobbies can
>>do is delay the ban. But is this necessarily a good thing?
>Yes. Later is bad, but sooner is worse. First of all, "Soon" means
>"We lost already", while "Later" means "We haven't lost yet, even
>though it looks pretty much like we're going to lose later,...
Even if we lose a battle legislatively tomorrow, this does not mean we
have "lost". In practice, people can still write code and distribute
it, the same way people are still making LSD, growing mushrooms, or
growing marijuana. Code propagates easily which means that so long as
there is any place in the world where it can be safely used, it will
Even if it is illegal throughout the world, there are going to be
places where the local administrators are too corrupt or incompetent
to really enforce the law. (The law is more or less impossible to
enforce anyway because you have to charge people with possession of
This means that somebody will be using the stuff, and the New
Renaissance will still happen, but the benefits will have to propagate
back into the United States for a change.
The greatest risk is of a major government going "ape" over this issue
and randomly persecuting those they suspect of doing illegal
arithmetic without real evidence or real trials. The passing of a law
may mitigate this because they will feel as if they are doing
something, even if the "problem" was not entirely solved.
Editor in Chief
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----