[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Oxley Amendment
I agree that there should be *NO* rules about encryption... If the government wants to break encryption, buy the people who hack it and let them go just like every other good industrial country...
M.
-----Original Message-----
From: Lucky Green [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 1997 9:17 AM
To: Michael Brock
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Oxley Amendment
On Wed, 24 Sep 1997, Michael Brock wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I wonder if Mr. Solomon of NY will rethink his decision to not bring
> up SAFE without Oxley to the entire House after the unprecedented
> coaltion of companies and individual groups that came together to
> make sure that mandatory key recovery stays a "1984" like dream. I
> find it incomprehensible that one man, would block the introduction
> of this bill, after it being proved that this is what his
> constituents want....
What in the world makes you believe that Mr. Solomon's constituents would
want SAFE to go the the floor? SAFE *must* be defeated, with or without
the Oxley ammendment.
-- Lucky Green <[email protected]> PGP encrypted email preferred.
"Tonga? Where the hell is Tonga? They have Cypherpunks there?"