[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Corporate Access to Keys (CAK) Considered Harmful

To: Tim May <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Corporate Access to Keys (CAK) Considered Harmful
From: The Prosecutor <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 11:35:34 -0600
CC: [email protected]
Organization: "Hey! There's an empty seat on this bus."
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> (message from Jon Callas on Tue, 07 Oct 1997 14:27:10 -0700) <v03102800b064086075b3@[207.167.93.63]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]


Tim May wrote:
> At 11:48 PM -0700 10/9/97, John W. Noerenberg wrote:
> >Moreover, it is not unheard of during legal discovery for email to be made
> >subject to search (Our lawyers are constantly tut-tuting about all the
> >email that is saved).  So to say it is not used for long-term storage is
> >simply incorrect.
> 
> Not surprising that your lawyers are worried about extensive mail archives.
> Imagine the juicy things that must lie in gigabytes of archived e-mail
> messages! (Or the messages which can be twisted by skilled lawyers into
> seeming to be anticompetitive, price-fixing, conspiratorial, etc.)

So, Mr. May...I see that you have instructed your "skilled lawyer" to
make certain my client's email messages are "twisted" to seem
anticompetitive, price-fixing and conspiratorial.
Now all I have to do is find a client to sue you...

The Prosecutor
"Hold that ambulance!"

References:
- Re: What's really in PGP 5.5?
  - From: Adam Back <[email protected]>
- What's really in PGP 5.5?
  - From: Jon Callas <[email protected]>
- Corporate Access to Keys (CAK) Considered Harmful
  - From: Tim May <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: America as a Shake Down Extortion State
Next by Date: Re: CAK as a really bad form of corporate networking
Prev by thread: Corporate Access to Keys (CAK) Considered Harmful
Next by thread: Re: Corporate Access to Keys (CAK) Considered Harmful
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread