[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What's really in PGP 5.5?
On Fri, Oct 10, 1997 at 11:40:46AM +0100, Adam Back wrote:
>
[...]
>
> If the company has an approval system for official statements (seems
> reasonable, if it's a press release, important contractual decision,
> etc), then Alice can send a copy to the legal beagles for the ok, and
> they can send it on.
Isn't it the whole presumption that what Alice is sending is important
company information? That is, that Alice *is* a 'legal beagle' or some
such? Casual or semi-private email may or may not be allowed,
depending on how paranoid or repressive the company, but that isn't
the issue, as I see it. The issue is 'important company email'.
[...]
--
Kent Crispin "No reason to get excited",
[email protected] the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55
http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html