[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: commercial data recovery

To: [email protected] (Zooko Journeyman)
Subject: Re: commercial data recovery
From: Andrew Bromage <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 09:58:50 +1000 (EST)
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from Zooko Journeyman at "Oct 14, 97 12:53:39 pm"
Sender: [email protected]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

G'day all.

Zooko Journeyman wrote:

> I wonder if it is too much early-days to start talking about
> advanced protocols e.g. secret-splitting in IETF-Open-PGP?  

One list member has encouraged me to write an internet-draft for a key
quorum system, so I am.  The trouble is that my proposed implementation
needs some info that isn't in the current IETF draft (the format of the
"string to key" object).

Is it actually documented anywhere that we can access?

Cheers,
Andrew Bromage

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNEQHMBF7J5ORR6ohAQEtJQP/XlunlxxrKDwh0zlTBiWeURSvUbo3Lvup
vp+Ex9gyraWuX+eaIoioQw+iQ7uLlWxeCRPVlVrpsnYG4YJF7vO1QKVxHuTZEbXj
wUZyS8WXv+3TRjakCfKf2nNP6lDgYs2W67eZhmYzuwC/2uNn078DbAWg8TLcy1ji
GvKEy0n4pLI=
=4Ypn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- commercial data recovery
  - From: Zooko Journeyman <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: New Mailing List: Terrorism
Next by Date: Re: Just say "No" to key recovery concerns...keep OpenPGP pure
Prev by thread: Re: Just say "No" to key recovery concerns...keep OpenPGP pure
Next by thread: Why CMR is bad civic hygene;the short version
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread