re: consensus on pgp? can we consolidate for action?

["Attila T. Hun" <attila@hun.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

    after I mailed the rant, I thought maybe the paragraph below
    was incomplete:

#   of course, I may be presumptuous PGP would even want to hear
#   from us, let alone have any form of "Cypherpunks Inside" 
#   (yuk) label on the box! particularly with the round robin 
#   multi-teaming of the sleepless Jon Callas.
#
    should have said
    
        ..."Cypherpunks Inside" label on the box: of course, 
        they might it consider it preferable to being labeled:

                "Big Brother Inside"
#
#
        this has been an addendum to an attila rant...

        attila, out, again, one more time....

  it aint over 'til the fat lady sings and vahalla is burning!

 "attila" sig: 1024/C20B6905/23D0 FA7F 6A8F 6066 BCAF AE56 98C0 D7B0 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: latin1
Comment: No safety this side of the grave. Never was; never will be

iQCVAwUBNEZc+L04kQrCC2kFAQE1AwP/W+BJ+a2rGhTh90lnMqt8RZCTOtmpWYrl
DMCQ+zojBnfRAkzZ/ethdnXYNgOlCRV/xWejMgOjLxlp3LDiAfzdgJM+u4ZCbZR3
Dvmkfs8uu8oK8E+3Ztb/H3XovXM6pxUtwoEaJKlOScBw2ypLFER3aZe1SVLnmDeb
P9vIBbx5j+4=
=NOox
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----