[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: shared keys, proxy encryption (was Re: PGP 5.5 CMR/GAK: a

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: shared keys, proxy encryption (was Re: PGP 5.5 CMR/GAK: a
From: [email protected] (Lutz Donnerhacke)
Date: 23 Oct 1997 13:38:37 GMT
Newsgroups: iks.lists.cypherpunks
Organization: IKS GmbH Jena
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

* Adam Back wrote:
>One thing I never did get clear is: does pgp5.0 know how to reply to
>the CMR denoted extra recipients?

Yes. (AFAI read the source). It uses ALL these keys optional or required to
encrypt an answer to. I a keys is missing encryption fails.

>It also avoids key escrow for communication keys, and allows separate
>personal and company use storage keys, makes recommendations for

Included in the current Open PGP draft.

References:
- Re: shared keys, proxy encryption (was Re: PGP 5.5 CMR/GAK: a possible solution)
  - From: Adam Back <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: shared keys, proxy encryption (was Re: PGP 5.5 CMR/GAK: a
Next by Date: Fwd: 56-bit RSA/RC5 Cracked
Prev by thread: Re: shared keys, proxy encryption (was Re: PGP 5.5 CMR/GAK: a possible solution)
Next by thread: Re: shared keys, proxy encryption (was Re: PGP 5.5 CMR/GAK: a
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread