Re: Doubts about Smith legislation (Falk & Allberry)

["Igor Chudov @ home" <ichudov@www.video-collage.com>]

In news.groups, Cipher <cipher@mindspring.com> wrote:
* In article <62oshu$pov@news1.panix.com> Information Security,
* The@NSA.sucks writes:
* >To further rub in things, the UCENET II proponents are coming
* >out with a "munging FAQ" that lists three times as many
* >"reasons" not to munge versus to munge.
* >
* >What a bunch of assholes.
* >
* >On top of that, Mozena couldn't even state in plain English
* >in the CFV for comp.org.cauce that it will require your
* >real email address to post...it just kinda mumbles it
* >while talking about robomoderation and tokens.
* >
* >Someone should give Mozena a hard kick in the balls.

Let us give the anti-privacy, anti-munging, and anti-anonymity
proponents a collective kick in the ass by voting against
comp.org.cauce in its present form.

To get a ballot and vote, send email to
bostwick@cas.chemistry.gatech.edu and ask him for comp.org.cauce ballot.

-- 
	- Igor.