[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Killing those who need killing (fwd)
Forwarded message:
> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 20:21:23 -0800 (PST)
> From: Mix <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Killing those who need killing
> Tim May wrote:
> >Don't any of you get any ideas here, but in California it is
> >ridiculously easy to get someone committed for a 72-hour observation
> >period. All one has to do is convince one of the various agencies
> >that a person is a possible danger to himself or to others....
>
> >...Worst of all, the mere fact of having been committed, regardless
> >of the eventual outcome, can mean a complete loss of rights to own a
> >handgun, rifle, or shotgun for a long period (10 years, I
> >think). Failure to let the Thought Police in for a look around one's
> >home is almost ipso facto grounds for committment.
>
> Use of remailers lessens this and other risks.
Ok, Monty, explain how my use of remailers is going to help me when my
son-in-law (for example) decides that he wants my property and decides to
have me examined? The mere fact that he can prove I use anonymous remailers
will only boost his assertion that I am a paranoid. If my hard drive is
encrypted that is further proof of my 'illness'.
Swords cut both ways.
____________________________________________________________________
| |
| The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there |
| be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves. |
| |
| -Alan Greenspan- |
| |
| _____ The Armadillo Group |
| ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA |
| /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ |
| .', |||| `/( e\ |
| -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate |
| [email protected] |
| 512-451-7087 |
|____________________________________________________________________|