[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hughes Markets? (Was Re: Copyright commerce and the street musician protocol)
--- begin forwarded text
X-Sender: [email protected]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 14:52:30 -0500
To: Robert Hettinga <[email protected]>
From: [email protected] (Art Hutchinson)
Subject: Re: Hughes Markets? (Was Re: Copyright commerce and the street
musician protocol)
Cc: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [email protected] (Art Hutchinson)
Robert Hettinga wrote:
>A whole bunch of people are now talking about these cash-settled recursive
>auction processes, and they're a direct, and now obvious, consequence of
>bearer (or at least instant) settlement markets for information on geodesic
>networks. When you add anonymity to the transaction, you pretty much have
>the final straw for "rights" tracking. Watermarks just tell you who the
>information was stolen from, for instance. So, one more industrial
>information process bites the dust.
Whoa! Hang on here. Sure, watermarks will tell you who information
was stolen from, but they're just a stalking horse... a weak second cousin
to *persistent* content control technologies (such as IBM's Cryptolopes
and Intertrust's Digiboxes). These allow rightsholders to manage a wide
range of parameters (including price, usage context, and any other variable
for which you can imagine having a certificate). Whats fundamentally
different about what are generically referred to as secure envelopes, is
that they can maintain controls *indefinitely* (persistence), across an un-
known, ad hoc, web of distribution over which one otherwise has no
control. And yes, this can all work even in a completely disconnected
environment (laptop at 35,000 feet).
They allow rightsholders, if they so choose, to *continue* being rights-
holders in a highly networked, digital world, and in a wide range of new
ways, based on entirely new (or old) business models, that take advantage
of rich/elaborate conditions for usage (e.g. you can view this picture
anonymously, but it will cost you 2X as much, and you can only get it at
low resolution, and you can't view it at all unless you can prove that you
don't live in the Middle East). No certificate for these conditions?
Sorry, no content.
They are based the same basic stuff (public key cryptography of course)
that *can* fuel wild anarchic visions of anonymous exchange. ;)
But they aren't at all deterministic of any particular economic model.
Regards,
- Art
Art Hutchinson [email protected]
Northeast Consulting Resources, Inc. phone: (617) 654-0635
One Liberty Square fax: (617) 654-0654
Boston, MA 02160 www.ncri.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Working at the intersection of business and IT strategy to
help organizations embrace electronic commerce opportunities"
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"[email protected]" with one line of text: "help".
--- end forwarded text
-----------------
Robert Hettinga ([email protected]), Philodox
e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/
Ask me about FC98 in Anguilla!: <http://www.fc98.ai/>