[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can I do Pubkic Domain that -
Exportability rules are based up the notion that the USA has the best
technology (perhaps true) and that non-Americans, such as the notorious
Chinese, are too far behind.
Whereas the truth is that many countries in the have the necessary
technology and have possessed it for a long time. There is absolutely no
evidence that the US gov't crypto export rules are impeding drug cartels in
the least.
So there is a peverse mix cognitive dissonance, xenophobia ("what do those
chinks know anyway?!!), and sycophantism (telling the President what he
wants to hear).
Somebody please tell me how this idiocy can persist.
-----Original Message-----
>At 12:58 PM 12/18/97 -0700, Tim May wrote:
>>At 12:04 PM -0700 12/18/97, David Honig wrote:
>>>At 06:33 PM 12/17/97 -0800, Bruce Balden wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Those guys just never learn that not only is the barn door open, but
that
>>>>contents were never theirs to begin with.
>>>>
>>>
>>>They blew their chance to regulate *computers* as military tech.
>>>Computers, after all, were developed by the military for ballistic,
bombs,
>>>and codes.
>>
>>I can't follow your logic here. Several points:
>
>>
>
>
>The develoment of computers can be traced along numerous threads. One
>thread (from say the 40's to 50's)
>traces the encouragement of the codebreaking, ballistics, h-bomb fluid
>dynamics, and missile
>control community.
>
>By the 50's the computer was done, and improvements were just making better
>implementations.
>
>It is admittedly oversimplifying to follow only one thread (e.g., only
>mathematical or engineering development),
>but in the early days (way before intel) computers were built for the uses
>I describe.
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------
> David Honig Orbit Technology
> [email protected] Intaanetto Jigyoubu
>
> M-16 : Don Quixote :: PGP : Louis Freeh
> Let freedom ring (or screech at 28.8)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>