[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Remailers & N.E.T.



At 1:25 PM -0800 1/8/98, Robert A. Costner wrote:
>At 12:47 PM 1/8/98 -0800, Tim May wrote:
>>(Though the SPA and others may then go after the remailers. Ironically, the
>>CDA exempted remailers--though not by name--from liability for messages.)
>
>Unfortunately you are semi wrong here.  The CDA specifically does not cover
>Intellectual property matters, and the SPA has consistently insisted that
>the ISPs are liable for what their users do with copyrighted materials.
>
I had a professor in college who called this kind of argument
"Proof by repeated assertion".

That is what the SPA (a private organization) is doing.

-- Marshall

Marshall Clow     Adobe Systems   <mailto:[email protected]>

Warning: Objects in calendar are closer than they appear.