[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why are you bouncing my mail to Cypherpunks?
The antispam assholes suddenly blocked domain ix.netcom.com.
(an amazing thing to do, all in all, and shows how far away from reality
can people be carried out by religion)
It turned out that sendmail at our mail relay site was ckecking
their "blackhole DNS database".
I deleted all the rules that refer to them and now things seem to be OK.
I am sorry for your troubles, Bill. Thanks for letting me know.
igor
Bill Stewart wrote:
>
> Hi, Igor - this bounced. Is it because I sent it as
> [email protected]
> instead of
> [email protected]
> (which is how I subscribe, through cyberpass), or is RBL blocking
> Netcom again, or is something else wrong?
>
> Thanks; Bill
>
>
> >Return-Path: <>
> >Received: from dfw-ix13.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix13.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.13])
> > by ixmail7.ix.netcom.com (8.8.7-s-4/8.8.7/(NETCOM v1.01)) with ESMTP id KAA03312;
> > for <[email protected]>; Mon, 4 May 1998 10:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
> >Received: from localhost (localhost)
> > by dfw-ix13.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with internal
> > id MAA15308; Mon, 4 May 1998 12:15:32 -0500 (CDT)
> >Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 12:15:32 -0500 (CDT)
> >From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[email protected]>
> >Message-Id: <[email protected]>
> >To: <[email protected]>
> >Subject: Returned mail: Service unavailable
> >Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
> >
> >The original message was received at Mon, 4 May 1998 12:14:52 -0500 (CDT)
> >from smap@localhost
> >
> > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> ><[email protected]>
> >
> > ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> >... while talking to mail.algebra.com.:
> >>>> MAIL From:<[email protected]> SIZE=1102
> ><<< 521 <[email protected]>... #blocked.contact postmaster
> >554 <[email protected]>... Service unavailable
> >
> > ----- Original message follows -----
> >
> >Return-Path: <[email protected]>
> >Received: (from smap@localhost)
> > by dfw-ix13.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4)
> > id MAA15254 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 4 May 1998 12:14:52 -0500 (CDT)
> >Received: from pax-ca6-17.ix.netcom.com(199.35.217.209) by dfw-ix13.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3)
> > id rma015185; Mon May 4 12:14:15 1998
> >Message-Id: <[email protected]>
> >X-Sender: [email protected]
> >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32)
> >Date: Mon, 04 May 1998 10:06:35 -0700
> >To: [email protected]
> >From: Bill Stewart <[email protected]>
> >Subject: Forward: --India's INSAT hacked
> >Mime-Version: 1.0
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> >>From Computer Underground Digest
> >------------------------------
> >
> >Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 11:06:30 -0700
> >From: Jeremy Lassen <[email protected]>
> >Subject: File 9--India's INSAT hacked
> >
> >Space Age Publishing's India correspondent B. R. Rao reports that
> >"hackers" have succeeded in stealing transponder time on board
> >India's domestic communications satellite, INSAT. The Network
> >Ops. Control Center(NOCC)of India's Dept. of Telecommunications
> >is "...in the process of identifying the culprits".
> >
> >The director of NOCC confirms that a reward has been offered to
> >anyone who can provide information that helps identify the
> >culprits. Reports indicate the NOCC is aware that "...anybody in
> >possession of the technical details of INSAT and its frequency
> >ranges can at regular intervals tap into its transponders and
> >transmit data free across the globe."
> >
> >I know this is rather vague, but I hadn't read about this
> >anywhere else, and thought that the CUD's readers might find it
> >interesting. Anybody need some transponders time? :)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Thanks!
> Bill
> Bill Stewart, [email protected]
> PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF 3C85 B884 0ABE 4639
>
>
>
> Thanks!
> Bill
> Bill Stewart, [email protected]
> PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF 3C85 B884 0ABE 4639
>
- Igor.