[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Clinton's fake apologies
What chance is there that the Paula Jones case was dismissed BECAUSE Wild
Bill lied under oath?
Remember OJ?
X
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Petro
Sent: Monday, September 14, 1998 9:03 AM
To: Jim Gillogly; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Clinton's fake apologies
At 10:49 AM -0500 9/12/98, Jim Gillogly wrote:
>IANAL (feel free to weigh in here, Unicorn), but I heard on one show or
>another that lying under oath is perjury only if it's material to the
>suit. Since the Jones case was dismissed, it was argued that even if he
>lied then, it wasn't material and thus wasn't perjury -- they claimed that
>nobody had every been convicted of perjury for lying in a case that was
>dismissed.