[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Clinton's fake apologies (fwd)

To: Jim Choate <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: Clinton's fake apologies (fwd)
From: Anonymous <[email protected]>
Date: 19 Sep 1998 21:21:26 -0000
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.Please report problems or inappropriate use to theremailer administrator at <[email protected]>.
Sender: [email protected]

Jim Choate wrote:
> 
> [email protected] wrote:
> > Subject: Re: Clinton's fake apologies (fwd)
> 
> > Presumably he should lie to protect the state.
> 
> Then don't take the oath:
> 
> To tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
> 
...

> > So lieing per se isn't the problem.
> 
> No, it's the fact that he took an oath to tell the truth and didn't.
> 
> > Murky water
> > for impeachment, methinks.
> 
> Then you don't think very well.
> 

What? To tell a lie is one thing, but if you preface it with "I'm telling the truth",
then that is really really bad? I still think you're drawing a very fine line.

I'm honoured to draw an ad hominem before revealing that I'm on AOL.

-- an anonymous aol32 user.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Clinton's fake apologies (fwd)
  - From: Reeza! <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Questions for Magaziner?
Next by Date: Re: A question from Seattle
Prev by thread: Re: Clinton's fake apologies (fwd)
Next by thread: Re: Clinton's fake apologies (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread