[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IP: ISPI Clips 5.49: More on The FBI's New Wiretap Authority




From: "ama-gi ISPI" <[email protected]>
Subject: IP: ISPI Clips 5.49: More on The FBI's New Wiretap Authority
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 00:01:14 -0700
To: <[email protected]>

ISPI Clips 5.49: More on The FBI's New Wiretap Authority
News & Info from the Institute for the Study of Privacy Issues (ISPI)
Saturday October 17, 1998
[email protected]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This From: ABC News.com, October 13, 1998
http://www.abcnews.com

Taps For Privacy?
Investigators Can Follow Suspects From Phone To Phone
http://www.abcnews.com/sections/tech/DailyNews/wirelaw981013.html

By
Chris Stamper
ABCNEWS.com

Buried deep inside the Intelligence Authorization Act of 1999 is a
provision that will change the way the FBI and other law enforcement
agencies can listen to suspects’ phone calls. The new rule opens the doors
for more “roving” wiretaps, which listen to all the phones a suspect uses
rather than just a single line.

     Supporters say this will help the cops keep up with cell-phone
wielding crooks. Critics contend that it opens the door for ever more
invasions of privacy.

    The bill passed the House and Senate last week; President Clinton is
expected to sign it soon. A similar change was voted down in 1996 as part
of an anti-terrorism measure.


An Invitation to Abuse?

To bug a suspect, investigators must first obtain a court order. Current
federal wiretapping law allows multiple taps only if law enforcement can
convince a judge that a suspect is trying to avoid being overheard. The new
bill, introduced by Rep. Porter Goss (R-Fla.), requires only that
investigators show probable cause that “the person’s actions could have the
effect of thwarting interception.”

    Supporters maintain that such a change is necessary to keep up with
exploding technology. Suspects whose lines are tapped can easily switch to
a pay phone or cell phone and avoid detection.

    But Leslie Hagin, legislative director of the National Association of
Criminal Defense Lawyers, echoes the sentiments of many criminal defense
attorneys and civil libertarians who feel that the expansion of powers is
an invitation to abuse: “It’s not a power the government needs.”

    Defense attorneys such as Gregory Nicolaysen, founder of the
Association of Federal Defense Attorneys, complain that too many judges
rubber-stamp wiretapping requests and that the new law will only make that
situation worse: “The assumption is that those who are being wiretapped are
criminals anyway.”

    “It’s not being confined to drug dealers and organized crime,”
Nicolaysen argues. “It tends to be a knee-jerk reaction instead of an
investigative tool of last resort.”


The Phones Have Ears

According to the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, federal
and state judges approved 1,186 wiretap applications in 1997 and 1,094 bugs
were planted. No requests were denied last year. Judges have rejected only
28 of over 20,000 applications since wiretapping was legalized in 1968.
Authorities arrested 3,086 people in 1997 with the help of phone taps,
which are typically placed in homes.

     The American Civil Liberties Union says that for every wiretap placed,
nearly a thousand innocent conversations are intercepted by law
enforcement. According to ACLU legislative counsel Greg Nojeim, the new
bill will mean that the phones of a suspect’s friends, family and business
colleagues can all be tapped by law enforcement: “It means more wiretaps,
more lines tapped and additional thousands of intercepted innocent
conversations.”

     The FBI says snoops have to ignore conversations that aren’t relevant
to their investigations. “Under existing wiretap statutes,” says special
agent Barry Smith, “law enforcement is only authorized to listen to those
conversations that are related to criminal activity.”

     Nojeim argues that since roving wiretaps will be easier to obtain,
citizens’ Fourth Amendment rights protecting against illegal searches will
erode. “When the government wants to search a place, it has to specify the
place it wants to search,” he says. “Now for electronic surveillance the
specificity requirement is done away with.”

    Smith says a hefty increase in roving wiretaps is unlikely, since such
an operation requires a team of surveillance experts who must coordinate
their efforts with several different phone companies: “It’s still a
technological and logistical nightmare.”

     Whether one believes that the new bill represents an invasion of
privacy, it seems clear that crooks won’t be able to escape to their cell
phones much longer without fear of being overheard.

Copyright (c)1998 ABCNEWS

--------------------------------NOTICE:------------------------------
ISPI Clips are news & opinion articles on privacy issues from
all points of view; they are clipped from local, national and international
newspapers, journals and magazines, etc. Inclusion as an ISPI Clip
does not necessarily reflect an endorsement of the content or opinion
by ISPI. In compliance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is
distributed free without profit or payment for non-profit research
and educational purposes only.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

ISPI Clips is a FREE e-mail service from the "Institute for the Study
of Privacy Issues" (ISPI). To receive "ISPI Clips" on a regular bases
(up to 3 - 8 clips per day) send the following message  "Please
enter [Your Name] into the ISPI Clips list: [Your e-mail address]" to:
[email protected]  .

The Institute for the Study of Privacy Issues (ISPI) is a small
contributor-funded organization based in Victoria, British Columbia
(Canada). ISPI operates on a not-for-profit basis, accepts no
government funding and takes a global perspective.

ISPI's mandate is to conduct & promote interdisciplinary research
into electronic, personal and  financial privacy with a view toward
helping ordinary people understand the degree of privacy they have
with respect to government, industry and each other and to likewise
inform them about techniques to enhance their privacy.

But, none of this can be accomplished without your kind and
generous financial support. If you value in the ISPI Clips service or if
you are concerned about the erosion of your privacy in general, won't
you please help us continue this important work by becoming an "ISPI
Clips Supporter" or by taking out an institute Membership?

We gratefully accept all contributions:

  Less than $60    ISPI Clips Supporter
          $60 - $99    Primary ISPI Membership (1 year)
      $100 - $300    Senior ISPI Membership (2 years)
More than $300    Executive Council Membership (life)

Your ISPI "membership" contribution entitles you to receive "The ISPI
Privacy Reporter" (our bi-monthly 12 page hard-copy newsletter in
multi-contributor format) for the duration of your membership.

For a contribution form with postal instructions please send the following
message "ISPI Contribution Form" to [email protected] .

We maintain a strict privacy policy. Any information you divulge to ISPI
is kept in strict confidence. It will not be sold, lent or given away to
any third party.











****************************************************
To subscribe or unsubscribe, email:
     [email protected]
with the message:
     (un)subscribe ignition-point [email protected]

or (un)subscribe ignition-point-digest [email protected]
****************************************************
www.telepath.com/believer
****************************************************