[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Limit on number of primes....a (stupid) idiot...




Jim Choate is so stupid that even when he accidentally gets something
right, he quickly "corrects" himself so that he is wrong again:

> I had typed x/ln(x) as the asymptotic limit for the number of primes less
> than x.
> 
> This is incorrect. It should be,
> 
> x/log(x)

Wrong, doofus.  x/ln(x) is the correct asymptotic limit.  What role could
logs to the base 10 possibly play?  Do you think God favors the number 10?
What a fool you are!