[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report
> >No, October 28, 2000 is when the act of circumventing an effective
> >technological measure becomes a violation (with exceptions for fair
> But if it was an "effective technological measure", it couldn't have
> been circumvented. And by circumventing CSS, wasn't it shown to not be
> an effective technological measure??
No, read the law. Their definition of "effective" is that it purports
to protect intellectual property. Welcome to Wonderland, where words
mean what *Congress* says they mean. Off with our heads!
> ``(B) a technological measure `effectively controls access
> to a work' if the measure, in the ordinary course of its
> operation, requires the application of information, or a process
> or a treatment, with the authority of the copyright owner, to
> gain access to the work.