[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
PEM vs. PGP formats
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: PEM vs. PGP formats
- From: [email protected]
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 93 17:37:47 -0500
- Comments: This message DID NOT originate from the address listed inthe From line. It was remailed by an automated remailing serviceoperating at that address. Please report problems by mailing to<[email protected]> with the subject header of PROBLEM.
- Remailed-By: Anonymous <[email protected]>
> On the other hand, in terms of anonymity, you can always generate a
> self-signed key with TIS/PEM (I forget the exact term they use in the
> TIS/PEM docs, but you can just make yourself a certificate which
> doesn't really say anything about your identity).
Yes, but this doesn't provide the service I desire. I *want* to be able
to sign a message, but I *only* want the intended recipient to know who
I am. PEM discloses the originator's ID *in the clear* when I send a
signed message. PGP hides the signature and all other information that
identifies me within the encrypted portion of the message!