[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Remailer Reliability

To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Remailer Reliability
From: miron@extropia.wimsey.com (Miron Cuperman)
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1993 20:31:07 GMT
Organization: Immortal Freedom's Deck
References: <9309030322.AA20056@netcom5.netcom.com>, <9309030539.AA16419@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
Sender: extropia.wimsey.com!usenet@wimsey.com
Sender: usenet@extropia.wimsey.com

ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu (L. Detweiler) writes:

>C'punks, it seems to me that the anonymous pool idea is underutilized
>by the remailers. I suggest that a remailer variation be developed that
>posts to an anonymous pool (some appropriate obscure newsgroup)

No need to change anything.  Just add a pool address to the
"Request-remailing-to:" line.

-- 
        Miron Cuperman <miron@extropia.wimsey.com> | NeXTmail/Mime ok
        Unix/C++/DSP,  consulting/contracting      | Public key avail
        AMIX: MCuperman                            |

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Remailer Reliability
  - From: miron@extropia.wimsey.com (Miron Cuperman)

References:
- Remailer Reliability
  - From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
- Re: Remailer Reliability
  - From: "L. Detweiler" <ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu>

Prev by Date: Gubment Bombmaker's Cookbook
Next by Date: PEM vs. PGP formats
Prev by thread: Re: Remailer Reliability
Next by thread: Re: Remailer Reliability
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread