[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FIDOnet encryption (or lack thereof)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In a msg on <Sep 30 12:15>, [email protected] of 1:216/21 writes:
m> From [email protected]
m> From: [email protected] (Mike Godwin)
m> To: [email protected] (J. Michael Diehl)
m> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1993 11:45:09 -0400 (EDT)
m> Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
m> Well, there's no doubt that users of his system can agree to
m> allow the sysop to read their mail. But what about people
m> whose mail passes *through* his system on the way to somewhere
m> else?
m> He has no agreement with them.
FidoNet policy has a statement allowing monitoring of all intransit
mail. I guess I'm going to have to dig my copy of Policy out of the
archives to post the relevant paragraphs.
This is a very shortsighted policy.
Although financial restraints have curtailed my operations here making
a lot of this moot, my own policy allows all users and passthru mail to be
encrypted. I neither monitor nor censor.
Jim
PGP key 1024/72C6A7
fingerprint = F5 74 29 3D 9C F8 A7 32 C7 98 F1 FE C4 85 FA 70
Protect your right to privacy. Say no to Clipper/Skipjack and key escrow
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a
iQCVAgUBLK8tCZuaN9X1csanAQFh6QP/bcfC21gOOnBMAAKoGTVON7u7NEda9Nqr
JtH1voGXQKArnRveoVffSTTlESjBC+yaBzi3t4Z1E37uELkd31r70M6OLIWDmw8o
QLvZXtoQJgCTzyzHUlY+K94XW3QznHllMVx2oYVJ53tKPn/HmrjwIN5Ml0orBU70
vhek/pyCXnk=
=f+Pj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
(Gated via FidoNet Node 1:1/31)
Jim Cannell Internet: [email protected]