[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FIDOnet encryption (or lack thereof)

To: Jim.Cannell@f21.n216.z1.fidonet.org (Jim Cannell)
Subject: Re: FIDOnet encryption (or lack thereof)
From: Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1993 20:22:03 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
In-Reply-To: <43862.2CAF3D72@ns.fidonet.org> from "Jim Cannell" at Oct 3, 93 06:17:48 pm

 
Jim writes:

> FidoNet policy has a statement allowing monitoring of all intransit
> mail.  I guess I'm going to have to dig my copy of Policy out of the
> archives to post the relevant paragraphs.
>  Jim Cannell      Internet: Jim.Cannell@f21.n216.z1.fidonet.org
If all users of FidoNet systems read this and agree with it prior to using
mail, then there's probably not an ECPA problem.


--Mike

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FIDOnet encryption (or lack thereof)
  - From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger@lehman.com>

References:
- Re: FIDOnet encryption (or lack thereof)
  - From: Jim.Cannell@f21.n216.z1.fidonet.org (Jim Cannell)

Prev by Date: Re: PGP in Fidonet
Next by Date: Re: NPR?
Prev by thread: Re: FIDOnet encryption (or lack thereof)
Next by thread: Re: FIDOnet encryption (or lack thereof)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread