[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ANON: _The Economist_ on South Korea
In message <[email protected]>, Eric Hughes writes:
> [...] One of Mr Kim;s first presidential acts was to bare his
> assets. Then ministers, MPs and top civil servants were all
> required to disclose their net worth. To no one's surprise, while
> the president's people were mostly clean, many of the old guard
> turned out to be rolling in wealth whose origins they could not
> readily explain. Many resigned.
>
> The "real names" reform, announced on August 12th, was Mr Kim's
> most radical step yet. The issue had been hotly debated for over a
> decade. Hitherto South Koreans had been able to keep bank accounts
> in any name they cared to invent; convenient for tax evasion, and
> for recycling the cash-stuffed white envelopes that for decades
> have routinely oiled the country's wheels of business and
> politics alike.
>A new target market?
My first reaction to this post was, "Are we supposed to feel sorry for these
people?" But then I realized that the real problem was giving other people
enough power over you that you depend on them to be honest.
--
Edward Elhauge | "The only thing worse than being talked about
Lever Industries | is not being talked about."
San Francisco | -- Oscar Wilde
[email protected] |