[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: standard for stegonography?
On Mon, 28 Feb 1994, Matthew Gream wrote:
>
> How about something like small random pad, maybe one octet, then a
> signature (such as "***Begin ...") with this header information being
> encrypted via IDEA CFB. You could also include a more structured header
> after this, ie. an ID for the software that created it, so the correct
> demodulation technique can be applied, or at least warned about if not
> available.
>
> With this type of method, unless you can pre-supply the key, the stego
> header should look like noise.
>
> Matthew.
> --
> Matthew Gream. ph: (02)-821-2043. [email protected].
> PGPMail and brown paperbags accepted. - Non Servatum -
> ''weirdo's make the world go around'' - A.Watts
>
If you're using one-time pads, why use PGP? _Public_ Key Cryptography...?
Sergey