[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: standard for stegonography?

To: [email protected] (Sergey Goldgaber)
Subject: Re: standard for stegonography?
From: [email protected] (Matthew Gream)
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 94 21:21:42 EST
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from "Sergey Goldgaber" at Feb 28, 94 01:11:12 am
Organization: University of Technology, Sydney.
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

Earlier, Sergey Goldgaber wrote:

> 
> If you're using one-time pads, why use PGP?  _Public_ Key Cryptography...?
> 

Huh ? The discussion was about a standard format for stego'd files,
so that different software could interoperate, unless I wildly 
misinterpreted.

Matthew.

-- 
Matthew Gream. ph: (02)-821-2043. [email protected].
PGPMail and brown paperbags accepted. - Non Servatum -
  ''weirdo's make the world go around'' - A.Watts

Follow-Ups:
- Re: standard for stegonography?
  - From: Sergey Goldgaber <[email protected]>
- Re: standard for stegonography?????!!!!??
  - From: [email protected] (Arsen Ray Arachelian)

References:
- Re: standard for stegonography?
  - From: Sergey Goldgaber <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Anybody heard of "The SLED"? (long)
Next by Date: RE: Clipper Death Threat
Prev by thread: Re: standard for stegonography?
Next by thread: Re: standard for stegonography?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread