[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Detweilering (was Re: Positive uses for PGP)

To: [email protected]
Subject: Detweilering (was Re: Positive uses for PGP)
From: [email protected] (John E. Kreznar)
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 94 15:27:18 PDT
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: "Robert A. Hayden"'s message of Sun, 3 Apr 1994 11:20:23 -0500 (CDT) <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

> On Sun, 3 Apr 1994, Mike McNally wrote:

> > I'm not Detweilering; I speak of the ostensible use of the signature
> > chain.)

> Detweilering?

> Sounds like an entry we need to get put into future versions of a Jargon 
> File.

Maybe it could be added to the FAQ.  You know, the one Detweiler wrote.

(:-)

	John E. Kreznar		| Relations among people to be by
	[email protected]	| mutual consent, or not at all.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLZ9COcDhz44ugybJAQH9OQP/TjJukjUH+PYP87Ims5OonokOlMVCSX8f
QekhHf4XPSgODPJltFM6Z7QnjOwgRwUwD5TxwkPlAcol2c11/OtHIwFhei3jsATW
H66KaQFr3LtGWMsdwEFTApRScr4CFSskzwsqMp1hXJRIZRNuy1qVKRBgufwd13sF
qJtfwd9278Q=
=NcUs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Detweilering (was Re: Positive uses for PGP)
  - From: "Robert A. Hayden" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: THOUGHT: International Electronic Declaration of Rights
Next by Date: Re: THOUGHT: International Electronic Declaration of Rights
Prev by thread: Detweilering (was Re: Positive uses for PGP)
Next by thread: Re: Detweilering (was Re: Positive uses for PGP)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread