[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Faking hostnames and inconvenient anon IP

To: [email protected] (Mike McNally)
Subject: Re: Faking hostnames and inconvenient anon IP
From: Sameer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 1994 13:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Mike McNally" at Apr 27, 94 03:18:49 pm
Pgp-Strong-Print: 3C AE E4 00 C2 6A 81 FF 49 4E EE 0C CD CD 1D 80
Sender: [email protected]

> 
> 
> Sameer writes:
>  > 	Well starting sometime this summer I'm going to start selling
>  > shell accounts, and I don't plan on spending much time verifying
>  > that there is a TrueName associated with any given account.
> 
> Most (all?) private PO box places won't give out a box without a
> "real" US mail address and some form of ID.  Is this due to legal
> requirements (direct or indirect)?  If so, can we not look forward to
> such restrictions being placed on those who supply electronic PO
> boxes?
> 
> --
> | GOOD TIME FOR MOVIE - GOING ||| Mike McNally <[email protected]>       |
> | TAKE TWA TO CAIRO.          ||| Tivoli Systems, Austin, TX:        |
> |     (actual fortune cookie) ||| "Like A Little Bit of Semi-Heaven" |
>

References:
- Re: Faking hostnames and inconvenient anon IP
  - From: [email protected] (Mike McNally)

Prev by Date: Re: CU Crypto Session Sat
Next by Date: No Subject
Prev by thread: Re: Faking hostnames and inconvenient anon IP
Next by thread: Re: Faking hostnames and inconvenient anon IP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread