[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Faking hostnames and inconvenient anon IP

To: Sameer <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Faking hostnames and inconvenient anon IP
From: [email protected] (Mike McNally)
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 94 15:18:49 CDT
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]><[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

Sameer writes:
 > 	Well starting sometime this summer I'm going to start selling
 > shell accounts, and I don't plan on spending much time verifying
 > that there is a TrueName associated with any given account.

Most (all?) private PO box places won't give out a box without a
"real" US mail address and some form of ID.  Is this due to legal
requirements (direct or indirect)?  If so, can we not look forward to
such restrictions being placed on those who supply electronic PO
boxes?

--
| GOOD TIME FOR MOVIE - GOING ||| Mike McNally <[email protected]>       |
| TAKE TWA TO CAIRO.          ||| Tivoli Systems, Austin, TX:        |
|     (actual fortune cookie) ||| "Like A Little Bit of Semi-Heaven" |

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Faking hostnames and inconvenient anon IP
  - From: Sameer <[email protected]>
- Re: Faking hostnames and inconvenient anon IP
  - From: Duncan Frissell <[email protected]>
- Faking hostnames and inconvenient anon IP
  - From: [email protected] (Eric Hughes)

References:
- Re: Faking hostnames and inconvenient anon IP
  - From: Sameer <[email protected]>
- Re: Faking hostnames and inconvenient anon IP
  - From: [email protected] (Arsen Ray Arachelian)

Prev by Date: Re: Gee...
Next by Date: Re: Gee...
Prev by thread: Re: Faking hostnames and inconvenient anon IP
Next by thread: Re: Faking hostnames and inconvenient anon IP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread