[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "bad" government



On Wed, 1 Feb 1995, Al Thompson wrote:

> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 1995 12:31:20 -0600
> From: Al Thompson <[email protected]>
> To: Charles Bell <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: "bad" government
> 
> 
> >> If strong government resulted in liberty and freedom, then the
> >> most intrusive, all-encompassing governments would result in 
> >> its citizens having the most liberty.  Is this the case?  I would
> >> look at the (former) Soviet Union, Iran, Cuba, East Germany, etc., 
> >> for your answer.
> 
> >Unrestricted individual freedom leads to unrestricted freedom of 
> >`private' corporations.  Private corporations uncurbed by society's law are 
> >autarkies: internally totalitarian, externally predatory, as amoral as 
> >amoebas.
> >
> >Is this the shape of the future you seek?

Yes, orginization by choice, not by design.

> You can NOT restrict someone's rights simply because they MIGHT harm another 
> (prior restraint).  If they do cause actual harm to someone, they should be 
> brought to justice.  To place restrictions on someone based on the 
> possibility that may may cause harm introduces restrictions based solely on 
> the authorities' opinions (political philosophy, religion, race, etc).

Precisely.

>  
> That that the shape of the future YOU seek?
> ************************************************************
> *           Just your basic signature block                *
> *                                                          *
> *  Al Thompson                                             *
> *  Fidonet 1:231/110                                       *
> *  [email protected]                                          *
> ************************************************************
> 
> 

073BB885A786F666 nemo repente fuit turpissimus - potestas scientiae in usu est
6E6D4506F6EDBC17 quaere verum ad infinitum, loquitur sub rosa    -    wichtig!