Cypherpunks Date Index for 1995 02




  • Re: PFF's Magna Carta and the new netserfs
  • How the cypherpunks nearly got me fired (long)
  • Re: CD-ROM [brief addition]
  • Scientology Petition v2.1
  • ESM
  • Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software
  • Re: The security characteristics of crypto modules with secrets
  • Minnesota Cypherpunks Get Together and Bull Session
  • Re: CD-ROM [brief addition]
  • Surety (authentication)
  • A proposal....
  • Re: CD-ROM [brief addition]
  • PGP Question
  • Re: CD-ROM [brief addition]
  • Re: VoicePGP cracked in 10 minutes?...
  • Re: How the cypherpunks nearly got me fired (long)
  • Re: The security characteristics of crypto modules with secrets
  • your membership renewal letter
  • Mystery files in the incoming/ directory
  • Re: The security characteristics of crypto modules with secrets
  • Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software
  • Re: "bad" government
  • Re: VoicePGP cracked in 10 minutes?...
  • What's with anon.penet.fi??
  • Fundamental Question?
  • Re: The security characteristics of crypto modules withsecrets
  • Re: Fundamental Question?
  • Re: Fundamental Question?
  • Clipper Revived?
  • Re: Fundamental Question?
  • Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software
  • Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software
  • FMP
  • Re: Fundamental Question?
  • Re: Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal
  • Re: Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal
  • Re: Fundamental Question?
  • Re: PGP Question
  • Lucky primes & omlets on my face...
  • Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.
  • Ending the Crusade
  • Thanks for not flaming !??!?
  • Re: Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal
  • Re: Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal
  • Re: Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal
  • NYC area C'Punks meet 2/11/95
  • Re: Lucky primes & omlets on my face...
  • Frothing remailers, the advertising and pinging problems
  • Re: Ending the Crusade
  • Re: Fundamental Question?
  • Re: Clipper Revived?
  • Re: Fundamental Question?
  • Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.
  • computer underground digest stuff
  • Frothing remailers and trust
  • Remailer encryption module
  • Re: Remailer encryption module
  • How much entropy in a key press?
  • Re: Remailer encryption module
  • Video encryption & QTC
  • Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.
  • Re: How much entropy in a key press?
  • Re: Remailer encryption module
  • Adding padding to PGP files
  • Re: Remailer encryption module
  • Re: Frothing remailers, the advertising and pinging problems
  • Re: Remailer encryption module
  • Re: Fundamental Question?
  • info
  • MX'ing and jpunix.com
  • Re: null
  • Remailer Unreliability
  • Re: Remailer encryption module
  • The FIREWALL CHIP. U're phone always offhook?
  • Remailing in safe-tcl
  • Re: "bad" government
  • Re: Remailer encryption module
  • Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.
  • Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal
  • Re: The FIREWALL CHIP. U're phone always offhook?
  • The FNORDWALL CHIP.
  • Re: Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal
  • Re: How much entropy in a key press?
  • Re: Remailer Unreliability
  • Re: Remailer Unreliability
  • 1995-02-02 President Names Members to Intelligence Commission (fwd)
  • Re: The FIREWALL CHIP. U're phone always offhook?
  • Re: Adding padding to PGP files
  • Re: Remailer Unreliability
  • Re: Adding padding to PGP files
  • Re: Remailer Unreliability
  • A simple idea
  • Re: The FIREWALL CHIP. U're phone always offhook?
  • Re: Adding padding to PGP files
  • Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.
  • Re: Remailing in safe-tcl
  • Re: Remailer Unreliability
  • No Subject
  • to hfinney
  • Re: THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS
  • Tribes, cyberspace and the communication society
  • Compromising the first remailer
  • Re: 1995-02-02 President Names Members to Intelligence Commissi
  • Re: THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS
  • Re: to hfinney
  • Re: The FIREWALL CHIP. U're phone always offhook?
  • Mugshot Identification Database announcement
  • re to hfinney
  • Re: Compromising the first remailer
  • Re: Remailer encryption module
  • NYT on Jihad
  • Re: re to hfinney
  • Re: Lucky primes & omlets on my face...
  • Re: The FIREWALL CHIP. U're phone always offhook?
  • Remailer Unreliability
  • Re: MX'ing and jpunix.com
  • Re: VoicePGP cracked in 10 minutes?...
  • Re: Is the remailer crisis over?
  • AIR Mosaic Feedback Mail
  • Re: re to hfinney
  • Re: commercial authecation
  • Wired Institutes PGP Usage For Subscriptions....
  • Re: commercial authecation
  • IMPORTANT: BUG IN 68K IDEA ASSEMBLER DISTRIBUTED IN SECURE EDIT
  • FIXED SEC. EDIT, SEC. EDIT SOURCE, UPGRADE PATCH
  • <none specified>
  • Re: Wired Institutes PGP Usage For Subscriptions....
  • Forward: Teleco/Cabe REg. & Free speech
  • NYC CPUNKS MEET NEXT SAT
  • Re: <none specified>
  • signature validation on secure edit messages
  • There is another NetCash
  • PGP padding scripts (again)
  • Re: PGP padding scripts (again)
  • Re: re to hfinney
  • Re: There is another NetCash
  • finney's perl scripts
  • Re: How the cypherpunks nearly got me fired (long)
  • Re: Forward: Teleco/Cabe REg. & Free speech
  • Vinge on PKE ?
  • Re: Vinge on PKE ?
  • Re: Vinge on PKE ?
  • Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.
  • Re: Forward: Teleco/Cabe REg. & Free speech
  • Vinge on PKE ?
  • Re: Vinge on PKE ?
  • Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.
  • Mixmaster client release
  • The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
  • NYT on Tera and UUNet
  • Here we go again...
  • No Subject
  • BROKEN REMAILERS
  • BROKEN REMAILERS
  • Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
  • Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
  • Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
  • Zimmermann charges dropped?
  • Re: How the cypherpunks nearly got me fired (long)
  • Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
  • Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
  • Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
  • Re: Zimmermann charges dropped?
  • Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
  • RE: VINGE ON PKE ?
  • Re: BROKEN REMAILERS
  • Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
  • Re: BROKEN REMAILERS
  • Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
  • Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
  • "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
  • Re: signature validation on secure edit messages
  • Judge not...
  • Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
  • Re: signature validation on secure edit messages
  • Re: Judge not...
  • Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
  • Excerpts of signed messages
  • dna ink
  • Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
  • Zimmermann charges NOT dropped
  • Re: Here we go again...
  • Re: Remailer encryption module
  • Re: finney's perl scripts
  • New directions in anonymity (needed)
  • Re: Judge not...
  • re finney's perl scripts
  • Creating commercial acceptability for remailers?
  • Re: Zimmermann charges NOT dropped
  • Mixmaster supports PGP
  • Re: New directions in anonymity (needed)
  • Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
  • Re: New directions in anonymity (needed)
  • Remailer msgs ideath -> rebma don't work.
  • Re: Legal implications of one-of-a-group guilt
  • Re: Legal implications of one-of-a-group guilt
  • Re: Excerpts of signed messages
  • Re: dna ink
  • Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
  • Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal
  • Cooperation
  • Re: Cooperation
  • Change to the congressional contact list
  • List of reliable remailers
  • Re: Vinge on PKE ? (really idiot savants)
  • Camden New Jersey
  • Re: Camden New Jersey
  • CFP'95 Program/Registration Information (fwd)
  • Re: Cooperation
  • Re: dna ink
  • Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
  • Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
  • Re: Cooperation
  • Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
  • MD5 coding
  • To Bundle Or Not To Bundle?
  • Re: MD5 coding
  • Re: Cooperation
  • Re: MD5 coding
  • Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
  • RE: Firewall chips
  • Re: Cooperation
  • Re: dna ink
  • Re: Cooperation
  • Re: dna ink
  • Selection key crypto protocol trial balloon
  • Re: Cooperation
  • Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
  • RE: DNA ink
  • preliminary cypherpunks announcement
  • a simple explanation of DC-Net
  • Re: alt.religion.your.operating.system.sucks
  • Remailer RFC
  • Re: dna ink
  • (dis)advantages of DC-Net vs remailers
  • Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
  • Re: a simple explanation of DC-Net
  • Re: dna ink
  • Re: New directions in anonymity (needed)
  • Re: dna ink
  • Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
  • Re: (dis)advantages of DC-Net vs remailers
  • Automatic Echo of Test Posting
  • Re: lwall
  • Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
  • Re: dna ink
  • Re: New directions in anonymity (needed)
  • Re: a simple explanation of DC-Net
  • Re: lwall
  • Re: MD5 coding
  • The Rise of "Worse is Better"...
  • Corporate Fascism, Rand, Greens, Oh My!
  • Re: Is the remailer crisis over?
  • Re: The Rise of "Worse is Better"...
  • Remailer Scripting Languages
  • Re: dna ink
  • Re: lwall
  • Re: Cooperation
  • RE: Re: lwall
  • Source code for Applied Cryptography
  • RE: Source code for Applied Cryptography
  • URGENT - What S.314 Would Do
  • Re: The Rise of "Worse is Better"...
  • MIME based remailing commands
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • Re: Is the remailer crisis over?
  • Re: (dis)advantages of DC-Net vs remailers
  • Re: dna ink
  • CIAC Bulletin F-10: HP-UX Remote Watch
  • testing the waters re: new crypto FTP site
  • Re: preliminary cypherpunks announcement
  • Re: CIAC Bulletin F-10: HP-UX Remote Watch
  • Re: Corporate Fascism, Rand, Greens, Oh My!
  • Re: Is the remailer crisis over?
  • Re: dna ink
  • dna ink
  • Re: dna ink
  • Seals and Sealing Waxes
  • CFP, Cypherpunks, and Crypto
  • Child Porno
  • Re: CFP, Cypherpunks, and Crypto
  • [email protected]
  • Zimmermann
  • Re: Zimmermann
  • noiz-0.5: simple noise-emitting package
  • EPIC Alert 2.02
  • NYC CPUNKS MEET
  • Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: Seals and Sealing Waxes
  • RE: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • a new way to do anonymity
  • Re: Zimmermann
  • Re: noiz-0.5: simple noise-emitting package
  • forward; e-cash
  • !NYC Cypherpunks meeting 2/11/95!
  • RE: a new way to do anonymity
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
  • Re: a new way to do anonymity
  • RE: a new way to do anonymity
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Fwd: Seals and Sealing Waxes
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • S.314, the "Pi Bill"
  • USPO & Digital Postage/E-Cash Project
  • Re: S.314, the "Pi Bill"
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • RE: a new way to do anonymity
  • Full text of S. 314
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • noiz ... and more SKRONK
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: URGENT - What S.314 Would Do
  • Re: Full text of S. 314
  • Congressional Phone Numbers
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Exon in WSJ
  • RE: a new way to do anonymity
  • WSJ Article on Sen. Exon's Legislation
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: WSJ Article on Sen. Exon's Legislation
  • Re: USPO & Digital Postage/E-Cash Project
  • MBONE access needed
  • Re: lwall
  • Email Add's of Senators?
  • Re: USPO & Digital Postage/E-Cash Project
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: Seals and Sealing Waxes
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • Re: Selection key crypto protocol trial balloon
  • Re: skronk
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: Full text of S. 314
  • Re: skronk
  • Re: skronk
  • Re: skronk
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: skronk
  • Four Horsemen
  • Jefferson Wheel Cypher
  • Re: Seals and Sealing Waxes
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: skronk
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • Judges-L FAQ
  • Re: Selection key crypto protocol trial balloon
  • Re: skronk
  • Wiretaps & terrorism
  • Re: Judges-L FAQ
  • Re: lwall
  • Re: Four Horsemen
  • Re: Judges-L FAQ
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • To clear this up.
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: Judges-L FAQ
  • Re: Jefferson Wheel Cypher
  • RE: a new way to do anonymity
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • Re: a new way to do anonymity
  • Hastur CT status
  • The drumbeat against anonymity continues....
  • Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
  • Re: Judges-L FAQ
  • Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
  • Meeting Anncouncement for Sat. Feb. 11 1995 SF Bay Area Meeting
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
  • Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
  • Re: Judges-L FAQ
  • Re: The Rise of "Worse is Better"...
  • Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
  • Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
  • Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
  • Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
  • Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
  • Vernor Vinge info...
  • Re: Judges-L FAQ
  • S314 and potential hell-raising
  • Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Da Judge-L FAQ -- We are not Amused
  • Re: S314 and potential hell-raising
  • Re: Hastur CT status
  • Re: skronk
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • Re: skronk
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • S. 314 and existing situation
  • Re: Da Judge-L FAQ -- We are not Amused
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: The drumbeat against anonymity continues....
  • Re: S314 and potential hell-raising
  • Re: S314 and potential hell-raising
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: S314 and potential hell-raising
  • Coming to a newsserver near you alt.defeat.s314
  • Re: S314 and potential hell-raising
  • Re: S314 and potential hell-raising
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: S314 and potential hell-raising
  • Re: Da Judge-L FAQ -- We are not Amused
  • NSO Challenge 95 Nr. 1
  • Re: The drumbeat against anonymity continues....
  • Crusade's End
  • Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal
  • re: Remailer Encryption Module
  • IQ & such
  • Lucky primes--third time's the charm?
  • Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.
  • Threat models. [was: Why encrypt intra-remailernet]
  • Mixmaster + T1
  • Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS?
  • Re: Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS?
  • Re: Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS?
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: S314 and potential hell-raising
  • Re: Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS?
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
  • Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
  • Re: Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS?
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS?
  • Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
  • Re: Cooperation
  • Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
  • Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
  • Re: Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS?
  • Re: Lucky primes--third time's the charm?
  • Senate Version of HR666 (fwd)
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • My pgp emacs code in ftp://ftp.markv.com/pub/jpp/pgpelisp/*
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: S. 314 and existing situation
  • NYT on HR666
  • Re: skronk
  • Re: skronk
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: S. 314 and existing situation
  • PEM
  • Re: Remailer Encryption Module
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • LESM - Link Encrypted Session Manager
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Wed 15 Feb, 730pm: BayFF's first monthly Bay Area EFF meeting
  • S.314 on Web
  • Key management in Hastur
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: Wed 15 Feb, 730pm: BayFF's first monthly Bay Area EFF meeting
  • No Subject
  • So, what's it all about?
  • RE: a new way to do anonymity
  • Re: So, what's it all about?
  • RE: a new way to do anonymity
  • Re: So, what's it all about?
  • Re: web pages sucking secrets from your hard drive
  • LESM - Link Encrypted Session Manager (3rd try)
  • RE: a new way to do anonymity
  • Re: LESM - Link Encrypted Session Manager (3rd try)
  • Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
  • Re: Da Judge-L FAQ -- We are not Amused
  • The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.)
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • (fwd) OREGON HOUSE BILL 2319 - Outlaw Anoniminty??
  • Labour and capital in a post-industrial economy
  • Re: Selection key crypto protocol trial balloon
  • Re: Selection key crypto protocol trial balloon
  • stupid legislation in Oregon
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Delphi and Encryption??
  • Re: The question is moot:
  • Re: The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.)
  • Not moot? [Was Re: The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.)]
  • Indian Supreme Court ends state control of the airwaves
  • GSM and cellular crypto
  • a draft petition against S.314
  • HR830 - Anyone tracking this?
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • Global Filesystem Guild
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • PSI Gulps Pipeline
  • Re: URGENT - What S.314 Would Do
  • http://www.vocaltec.com/gti.html
  • Bernstein! Where are YOU!
  • Re: Bernstein! Where are YOU!
  • Re: Global Filesystem Guild
  • why pgp sucks
  • Re: The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.)
  • Re: HR830 - Anyone tracking this?
  • Re: why pgp sucks
  • Re: Bernstein! Where are YOU!
  • Re: why pgp sucks
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • Re: why pgp sucks
  • Re: why pgp sucks
  • Re: why pgp sucks
  • Re: West (was:HR830 - Anyone tracking this?)
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • Re: So, what's it all about?
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • Re: why pgp sucks
  • Re: why pgp sucks
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • Re: Coming to a newsserver near you alt.defeat.s314
  • Re: why pgp sucks
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • Re: why pgp sucks
  • law vs technology
  • Re: why pgp sucks
  • Re: why pgp sucks
  • Re: Bernstein
  • Re: The drumbeat against anonymity (Cellphone security?)
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • Laws, Feds, & the Internet
  • Re: why pgp sucks
  • Re: why pgp sucks
  • Re: law vs technology
  • Re: S. 314 and existing situation
  • Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  • Re: why pgp sucks
  • Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet
  • why pgp sucks
  • Re: why pgp sucks
  • Re: So, what's it all about?
  • Re: why pgp sucks
  • Re: why pgp sucks
  • Re: why pgp sucks
  • Re: why pgp sucks
  • Re: why pgp sucks
  • Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • Re: Bernstein
  • Re: Bernstein
  • Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet
  • new book pre announcement
  • Re: why pgp sucks
  • Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet
  • Re: West (just a minute)
  • Re: Bernstein
  • automatic reply to test posting (lwall)
  • Re: why pgp sucks
  • Privacy vs. Ubiquitous Video: NetCam; Wearable WebCam, etc
  • NYT on Cybertheft and Sex Writer
  • Four Horsemen of the Infopocalypse?
  • Re: Not necessarily crypt
  • Forwarded mail....
  • Re: why pgp sucks
  • Re: S314 and potential hell-raising
  • Re: Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet
  • Re: Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet
  • Re: UMich student arrested for rape story
  • Re: NYT on Cybertheft and Sex Writer
  • "Being Digital" spinde
  • Does PGP scale well?
  • Re: Does PGP scale well?
  • Re: Does PGP scale well?
  • Secure Drive ver. & loc. ?
  • Feb 15th Meeting About PGP
  • TEMPEST Paper by Former Civilian (2/2)
  • TEMPEST Paper by Former Civilian (1/2)
  • Re: Does PGP scale well?
  • Re: law vs technology
  • Re: Does PGP scale well?
  • Re: Does PGP scale well?
  • Fwd: Re: West (just a minute)
  • Re: UMich student arrested for rape story
  • the problem that destroyed PGP
  • Re: the problem that destroyed PGP
  • Q: ref. for DNA used to solve math. network prob. (fwd)
  • Re: the problem that destroyed PGP
  • Re: the problem that destroyed PGP
  • Re: the problem that destroyed PGP
  • Re: the problem that destroyed PGP
  • Re: the problem that destroyed PGP
  • Re: The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.)
  • Privacy digest an all
  • Design my protocol
  • Re: the problem that destroyed PGP
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • Re: Q: ref. for DNA used to solve math. network prob. (fwd)
  • Involve Telcos in activism?
  • Clinton's No Warrant decree, and insulting dogs
  • Clinton's No Warrant decree, and insulting dogs
  • Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
  • Re: UMich student arrested for rape story
  • Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
  • Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
  • Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
  • Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
  • Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
  • Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
  • Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
  • Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
  • Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
  • Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
  • The NSA (Was Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions )
  • bill alert...
  • Re: The NSA (Was Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions )
  • Re: The NSA (Was Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions )
  • standards...
  • Re: UMich student arrested for rape story
  • Re: Our Ignorance of Govt. Capabilities
  • Re: UMich student arrested for rape story
  • The NSA (Was Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions )
  • Re: Our Ignorance....
  • Re: Q: ref. for DNA used to solve math. network prob. (fwd)
  • Re: Does Anyone Even Read This Stuff ? (was Re: The NSA)
  • Re: standards...
  • Re: The NSA (Was Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions )
  • Automatic reply to your test message (lwall)
  • you are invited...
  • Is Cyberspace Rich Enough?
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • Re: bill alert...
  • Archives?
  • Re: standards...
  • Re: The NSA (Was Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions )
  • Re: UMich student arrested for rape story
  • List of reliable remailers
  • Re: UMich student arrested for rape story
  • Re: bill alert...
  • Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
  • Re: bill alert...
  • Re: Is Cyberspace Rich Enough?
  • RE: Is Cyberspace Rich Enough?
  • Fun with numbers: Payment Switches
  • WSJ article on Internet Telephony
  • CDT POLICY POST No.2 -- X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS
  • Re: standards...
  • Re: Is Cyberspace Rich Enough?
  • [email protected]: Does PGP scale well?
  • Re: TEMPEST Paper by Former Civilian (1/2)
  • EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN
  • Re: bill alert...
  • Re: The NSA (Was Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions )
  • Archives
  • Re: bill alert...
  • Re: Is Cyberspace Rich Enough?
  • CNN (fwd) Communications (In)Decency Act?
  • Re: [email protected]: Does PGP scale well?
  • CDT POLICY POST No.2 -- X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS
  • No Subject
  • Re: lwall
  • EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN
  • Ignore Test
  • Re: EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN
  • What *is* the power of the FIPS
  • Excel 5 Encryption
  • Re: CDT POLICY POST No.2 -- X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS
  • Re: What *is* the power of the FIPS
  • Re: your mail
  • Re: Excel 5 Encryption
  • Re: CDT POLICY POST No.2 -- X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS
  • Re: What *is* the power of the FIPS
  • Re: CDT POLICY POST No.2 -- X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS
  • French Mystics, Martin Gardner, and Transcendentality
  • Re: CDT POLICY POST No.2 -- X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS
  • Re: EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN
  • Re: CDT POLICY POST No.2 -- X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS
  • Re: EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN
  • Re: MIME based remailing commands
  • Re: CDT POLICY POST No.2 -- X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS
  • Re: EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN
  • Re: What *is* the power of the FIPS
  • ref on crypto formalism
  • Zimmerphone, IPhone, NetPhone, Maven...
  • (Fwd) Returned mail
  • Re: EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN
  • Re: The NSA
  • Distributed Key Service for PGP (was: why pgp sucks)
  • The NSA (Was Re: Factorin
  • Re: ref on crypto formalism
  • Re: WSJ article on Internet Telephony
  • Re: CDT POLICY POST No.2 -- X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS
  • Re: Is Cyberspace Rich Enough?
  • Re: EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN
  • Internationalism no panacea
  • Cypher_punks standards, again.
  • Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet
  • Re: ANNOUNCE: New Crypto Product!
  • UNSUBCRIBE CENSORSHIP
  • UNSUBCRIBE CENSORSHIP
  • Re: Why Doesn't Wired.....
  • No Subject
  • No Subject

  • Mail converted by MHonArc 2.4.3