[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Da Judge-L FAQ -- We are not Amused

To: [email protected]
Subject: Da Judge-L FAQ -- We are not Amused
From: [email protected] (Timothy C. May)
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 1995 19:56:18 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]


It has come to Our attention that Our FAQ, the Da Judge-L FAQ, is being
distributed amongst the rabble.

We are not amused.

The so-called Cypherpunks List, having been a party to this illegal
and "most heinous" distribution, is hereby invited to appear in our
Chambers on the morning of Tuesday, 29 February, 1995, at a place of
our choosing. Defense will be heard, and then the guilty will be
punished.

Royally Yours, 

Da Judge-L

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Da Judge-L FAQ -- We are not Amused
  - From: joshua geller <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
Next by Date: Re: S314 and potential hell-raising
Prev by thread: Re: S314 and potential hell-raising
Next by thread: Re: Da Judge-L FAQ -- We are not Amused
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread