[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
Sandy, and other C'punks,
THIS IS A RESPONSE TO A GRAMMAR FLAME. But not, I hope, a flame
itself.
I respect your opinion, Sandy, and am glad you like what I wrote. And I
certainly don't take your grammar 'flame' personally. In fact, I
_agree_ with what you have said. But for one thing -- one of my
points was to rub their noses in a particularly stinky example of
stegnography. What secret messages are concealed in my letter? Can
anyone know? That was an essential point to my letter.
In retrospect I would change the analogy from parking lots to mail
carriers. (Does it make sense for a mail carrier to be held liable
for the 'bad' mail they happen to deliver?) I would also probably
point out that the internet community standard for what is obscene is
awfully loose, and seems to focus mainly on a brand of pork meat
product. ;)
I just got off the phone with my 'representatives.' Perhaps calling
them doesn't have the same impact that a letter does, but it is very
immediately gratifying.
j(who _can_ drive a spelling checker)'
P.S. Yes, you made an error in your post :). If you will proof my
letters to my reps I will proof yours. Deal?