[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MIME based remailing commands

To: Eric Hughes <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: MIME based remailing commands
From: Rick Busdiecker <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 1995 15:57:19 -0500
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 08 Feb 1995 20:25:32 PST." <[email protected]>
Organization: Lehman Brothers Inc.
Reply-To: Rick Busdiecker <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

    Date: Wed, 8 Feb 1995 20:25:32 -0800
    From: Eric Hughes <[email protected]>

    You say MIME, and you've not completely specified the data format,
    but rather constrained it in a way that most everybody basically
    agrees with, including me.

Could one of the MIME supporters (I guess that would be `most
everybody') explain why anything more than a To: header and an
encrypted block is desireable for the in-the-clear message?

Specifically, why is it desireable to broadcast additional information
about a message for which privacy is a primary concern?

--
Rick Busdiecker <[email protected]>      Please do not send electronic junk mail!
  Lehman Brothers Inc.
  3 World Financial Center  "The more laws and order are made prominent, the
  New York, NY  10285-1100   more thieves and robbers there will be." --Lao Tzu

Follow-Ups:
- Re: MIME based remailing commands
  - From: "Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]>
- Re: MIME based remailing commands
  - From: Hal <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: MIME based remailing commands
  - From: [email protected] (Eric Hughes)

Prev by Date: Re: MIME based remailing commands
Next by Date: Re: Coming to a newsserver near you alt.defeat.s314
Prev by thread: Re: MIME based remailing commands
Next by thread: Re: MIME based remailing commands
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread