Re: why pgp sucks

["James A. Donald" <jamesd@netcom.com>]

On Fri, 10 Feb 1995, Derek Atkins wrote:
> The point is to have a centralized, distributed key distribution
> mechanism, similar in concept to the PGP Public Keyservers, but which
> scale much much better.i

We already have a centralized, for profit, key distribution system.

http://ww.four11.com/InfoServices.html


If they make money off it, there will be more of them, they
will provide better service, and it will in due course
become a distributed key distribution system.

Digression:

I notice that it is possible to have thread titled 
"Why PGP sucks" without Holy Warriors leaping into 
the fray.

This is a marked contrast with certain other topics. 

Possibly the level of heat is inversely proportional
to the level of knowledge.  (I.e. it is safe to have
such a thread title because in this list we have
many people with considerable knowledge of several
different crypto systems, and who have spent 
considerable thought on the various possibilities.)


 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          |  
We have the right to defend ourselves     |   http://www.catalog.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind     |  
of animals that we are. True law          |   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the     |  
arbitrary power of the omnipotent state.  |   jamesd@netcom.com